Det danske Fredsakademi

Kronologi over fredssagen og international politik maj 2004 / Timeline May, 2004

Version 3.0
M T O T F L S
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

April 2004, Juni 2004


05/01/2004
Det er nu tolv måneder siden, at USAs præsident Bush erklærede krigen i Irak for vundet.

05/01/2004
Præsident Bush har skabt en overhængende ririko for, at den irakiske konflikt smelter sammen med den israelsk-palæstinensiske konflikt og skaber én stor uoverskuelig mellemøstlig konflikt, udtaler norges tidligere stats- og udenrigsminister Thorbjørn Jagland til Information.

05/01/2004
Books Not Bombs
The University of California in Santa Barbara where I live had an exciting confrontation with the Army, Airforce and Coast Guard recruiting officers. They wanted to recruit students promising an officers training. Students for Peace demonstrated and convinced the UNI administration to order the recruiters to leave the campus. One of the posters of the protesters said BOOKS NOT BOMBS.
The Chief Planer of the war in Iraq the neo conservative Vice President Dick Cheney never fought in the Vietnam war since he was able to obtain four deferments for his draft call.
Peter Carbone a columnist mentioned there are Neo Nazis in Germany und now Neo Conservatives in the Bush Troica.
The 130 pictures of the flag draped wooden boxes with the dead soldiers were released to the media without the Pentagon or White House permission.A bureaucratic mistake under the Freedom of Information Act. The military burial ceremonies were not seen in the press or on TV.
A growing number of US soldiers crossed the Canadian borders in civilian clothing. They are allowed to stay and have work permits. Several polls state that 60 % of voters believe it was a mistake to start a war against Iraq and the USA cannot win this high priced war, writes Kurt Singer.

05/01/2004
EU udvides med ti østeuropæiske lande.

05/02/2004
There are shocking new details of torture by US troops
by Peter Beaumont, Kamal Ahmed and Chris Stephens
© 2004 The Observer (London)
A new report tells how Iraqi prisoners were threatened with rape. Six British soldiers may be arrested over abuse claims.
Chilling new evidence of the torture and sexual abuse of Iraqi prisoners by American soldiers emerged last night in a secret report accusing the US army leadership of failings at the highest levels.
Detainees were subjected to 'sadistic, blatant and wanton criminal abuses', according to a military investigation suggesting that last week's photographs of US soldiers humiliating their naked captives may only have been the tip of the iceberg.
It comes amid reports that six British soldiers may shortly be arrested over claims that they too mistreated detainees. Soldiers from the Queen's Lancashire Regiment are understood to have been questioned in Cyprus after the publication yesterday of shocking photographs purporting to show a prisoner being beaten, kicked and urinated on while in the regiment's custody.
Legal experts warned last night that British soldiers could face war crimes trials if the allegations are proven, or if they are not exhaustively investigated.
The revelations can only increase already widespread anger at coalition forces' handling of the volatile situation in Iraq, where yesterday a foreign security guard was killed and three others wounded by a roadside bomb in the northern city of Mosul.
Annals of National Security : Torture at Abu Ghraib : American Soldiers Brutalized Iraqis. How Far Up Does the Responsibility Go?
by Seymour M. Hersh
© 2004 The New Yorker
In the era of Saddam Hussein, Abu Ghraib, twenty miles west of Baghdad, was one of the world's most notorious prisons, with torture, weekly executions, and vile living conditions. As many as fifty thousand men and women -- no accurate count is possible -- were jammed into Abu Ghraib at one time, in twelve-by-twelve-foot cells that were little more than human holding pits.
In the looting that followed the regime's collapse, last April, the huge prison complex, by then deserted, was stripped of everything that could be removed, including doors, windows, and bricks. The coalition authorities had the floors tiled, cells cleaned and repaired, and toilets, showers, and a new medical center added. Abu Ghraib was now a U.S. military prison. Most of the prisoners, however -- by the fall there were several thousand, including women and teen-agers -- were civilians, many of whom had been picked up in random military sweeps and at highway checkpoints. They fell into three loosely defined categories: common criminals; security detainees suspected of "crimes against the coalition"; and a small number of suspected "high-value" leaders of the insurgency against the coalition forces.
Last June, Janis Karpinski, an Army reserve brigadier general, was named commander of the 800th Military Police Brigade, and put in charge of military prisons in Iraq. General Karpinski, the only female commander in the war zone, was an experienced operations and intelligence officer who had served with the Special Forces and in the 1991 Gulf War, but she had never run a prison system. Now she was in charge of three large jails, eight battalions, and thirty-four hundred Army reservists, most of whom, like her, had no training in handling prisoners.
General Karpinski, who had wanted to be a soldier since she was five, is a business consultant in civilian life, and was enthusiastic about her new job. In an interview last December with the St. Petersburg Times, she said that, for many of the Iraqi inmates at Abu Ghraib, "living conditions now are better in prison than at home. At one point we were concerned that they wouldn't want to leave."
A month later, General Karpinski was formally admonished and quietly suspended, and a major investigation into the Army's prison system, authorized by Lieutenant General Ricardo S. Sanchez, the senior commander in Iraq, was under way. A fifty-three-page report, obtained by The New Yorker, written by Major General Antonio M. Taguba and not meant for public release, was completed in late February. Its conclusions about the institutional failures of the Army prison system were devastating. Specifically, Taguba found that between October and December of 2003 there were numerous instances of "sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses" at Abu Ghraib. This systematic and illegal abuse of detainees, Taguba reported, was perpetrated by soldiers of the 372nd Military Police Company, and also by members of the American intelligence community. (The 372nd was attached to the 320th M.P. Battalion, which reported to Karpinski's brigade headquarters.)
Den britiske hær har indledt en undersøgelse af otte soldater efter chokerende billeder af tortor mod en irakisk fange, skriver Berlingske Tidende.
Litteratur
Leder: Organiseret ondskab. I: Information, 05/03/2004.
Juul Jensen: USAs medier er forsigtige. I: Information, 05/03/2004.
Nielsen, Jørgen Steen: Fangetortur kan vælte USAs spil i Irak. I: Information, 05/03/2004.
Rasmussen, Annegrethe: Bileder chokerer briterne. I: Information, 05/03/2004.

05/03/2004
Folkemusikeren og pacifisten Pete Seeger fylder 85 år.

05/03/2004
Den internationle pressefriheds dag.
Kilde: Sperling, Vibeke: Stadig flere magthavere lægger bånd på medier. I: Politiken, 05/03/2004.

05/04/2004
Reverse The Reversal by 53 Former U.S. Diplomats : Retired U.S. diplomats urge President Bush to rethink his Israel policy.
http://tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/10338
Dear Mr. President:
We former U.S. diplomats applaud our 52 British colleagues who recently sent a letter to Prime Minister Tony Blair criticizing his Middle East policy and calling on Britain to exert more influence over the United States.
As retired foreign service officers, we care deeply about our nation's foreign policy and U.S. credibility in the world.
We also are deeply concerned by your April 14 endorsement of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's unilateral plan to reject the rights of three million Palestinians, to deny the right of refugees to return to their homeland, and to retain five large illegal settlement blocs in the occupied West Bank.
This plan defies UN Security Council resolutions calling for Israel's return of occupied territories.
It ignores international laws declaring Israeli settlements illegal.
It flouts UN Resolution 194, passed in 1948, which affirms the right of refugees to return to their homes or receive compensation for the loss of their property and assistance in resettling in a host country should they choose to do so.
And it undermines the Road Map for peace drawn up by the Quartet, including the United States. Finally, it reverses long-standing American policy in the Middle East.
Your meeting with Sharon followed a series of intensive negotiating sessions between Israelis and Americans, but which left out Palestinians.
In fact, you and Prime Minister Sharon consistently have excluded Palestinians from peace negotiations.
Former Palestinian Information Minister Yasser Abed Rabbo voiced the overwhelming reaction of people around the world when he said: "I believe President Bush declared the death of the peace process today."
By closing the door to negotiations with Palestinians and the possibility of a Palestinian state, you have proved that the United States is not an even-handed peace partner.
You have placed U.S. diplomats, civilians and military doing their jobs overseas in an untenable and even dangerous position.
Your unqualified support of Sharon's extra-judicial assassinations, Israel's Berlin Wall-like barrier, its harsh military measures in occupied territories, and now your endorsement of Sharon's unilateral plan are costing our country its credibility, prestige and friends.
It is not too late to reassert American principles of justice and fairness in our relations with all the peoples of the Middle East.
Support negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis, with the United States serving as a truly honest broker.
A return to the time-honored American tradition of fairness will reverse the present tide of ill will in Europe and the Middle East-even in Iraq.
Because the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is at the core of the problems in the Middle East, the entire region -- and the world -- will rejoice along with Israelis and Palestinians when the killing stops and peace is attained.
Andrew I.Killgore, Ambassador to Qatar, 1977-1980
Richard H. Curtiss, former chief inspector, US Information Agency
Colbert C. Held, Retired FSO and author
Thomas J. Carolan, Counsel General Istanbul, '88-'92
C. Edward Bernier, Counselor of Embassy, Information and Culture, Islamabad, Pakistan
Donald A. Kruse, American Consul in Jerusalem
Ambassador Edward L. Peck, former Chief of Mission in Iraq and Mauritania
John Powell, Admin. Counselor in Beirut, '75-'76
John Gunther Dean, U.S. Ambassador to India
Greg Thielmann, Director, Office for Strategic Proliferation and Military Affairs, Bureau of Intelligence and Research
James Akins, Ambassador to Saudi Arabia
Talcott Seeyle, Ambassador to Syria
Eugene Bird, Counselor of Embassy in Saudi Arabia
Richard H. Nolte, Ambassador to Egypt
Ray Close, Chief of Station Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 1971-1979
Shirl McArthur, Commercial Attache, Bangkok
David Fredrick, Country Director Peace Corps Morocco 1986-1990
Bill Rugh, Ambassador to UAE and Yemen
James Curran, Deputy Chief of Mission Togo 1973-1975
Joseph Cheevers, Office of Inspectors General 1987
Robert L. M. Nevitt, Minister for Press Affairs for the U.N.
John Brady Kiesling, Political Counselor, Greece
E. William Tatge, Counselor for Commercial Affairs, France
Henry Precht, Deputy Chief of Mission, Egypt
John O. Sutter, FSO, The Asia Foundation's Representative for Indonesia, 1982-1984
James J. Halsema, Counselor for Public Affairs, Egypt
Nancy LeRoy, Public Affairs Officer, Mexico
Thomas M. Martin, USIA Congressional Liaison Officer
Robert C. McLaughlin, USIA Madrid
Edward Alexander, Counselor for Public Affairs, East Berlin, 1976-1979
Roman Lotsberg, Admin. Officer, Office of European Affairs
Dr. Shirley Hill Witt, Cultural Affairs Officer, Zambia, 1994-1996
Arthur L. Lowrie, Political Advisor to the Commander in Chief, U.S. Central Command
Carleton Coon, Ambassador to Nepal 1981-1984
Jane Coon, Ambassador to Bangladesh, 1981-1984
George B. Roberts, Ambassador to Guyana, 1979-1981
Robert V. Keeley, Ambassador to Greece
John E. Marsh, First Secretary, Embassy Kuwait, 1971-1973
Thomas W. Fina, Consul General, Milan, 1973-1979
Harland H. Eastman, Consul General, Tangier, Morocco, and Tel Aviv, Israel
Arthur Mudge, Director, USAID Mission to Sudan, 1980-1983
Ronald I. Spiers, Undersecretary of State for Management
Albert L. Seligmann, Director, Office of Japanese Affairs, 1981-1983
Orin D. Parker, President, America-Middle East Educational Services, 1979-1988
Robert C. Amerson, Counselor for Public Affairs, Italy
Christian Freer, Colonel, AUS ret., former chief of CIA stations and War Plans staff
Thomas J. Hirschfeld, Deputy U.S. Rep MBFR Negotiations
Edward R. M. Kane, Deputy Chief of Station, CIA, Iraq
Col. Richard Hobbes, US Army Retired, Politico-Military Adviser to NEA 1974-1977
Col. David Antoon, US Air Force, Retired
Brig. General Augustine A. Verrengia, USAF Ret.
Greg Thielmann, Director, Office for Strategic Proliferation Military Affairs, Bureau of Intelligence and Research
Robin Berrington, Cultural Attache, Japan
Gary S. Usrey, Deputy Chief of Mission, Morocco
Owen Roberts, Ambassador to Togo
Chas W. Freeman, Jr. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Assistant Secretary of Defense, 1993-1994
Edwin Paul Kennedy, Jr., Regional Affairs Officer for N. African, Near Eastern, and S. Asian Affairs, USIA
Thomas J. Scotes, Ambassador to Yemen, 1975-1978
Michael Mennard, Ph.D., Regional Public Affairs Officer, India
Francois M. Dickman, Director Arabian Peninsula Affairs 1972-76, Ambassador to UAE 1976-79 and Kuwait 1979-83
Terrell E. Arnold, Former Deputy Director Office of Counterterrorism and Consul General, Brazil

05/05/2004
Regeringen læste ikke Amnesty Internationals rapport om tortur i Irak
"Det er bedrøveligt, at rapporterne fra Amnesty åbenbart ikke er blevet læst," siger Amnestys pressechef, Stig Nielsen. Allerede i september 2003, dvs. for otte måneder siden, sendte Amnesty Internationals danske afdeling breve og rapporter til Udenrigs- og Forsvarsministeriet om, at der foregik tortur i Irak efter Saddam Husseins fald. I brevene opfordrede Amnesty regeringen til at lægge pres på den amerikanske administration i Irak for at få undersøgt påstandene om tortur. Det undrede derfor Amnesty, da statsminister Anders Fogh Rasmussen tirsdag den 4. maj udtalte til Folketinget, at regeringen ikke havde modtaget nogen oplysninger om tortur i Irak, og organisationen valgte derfor i går at offentliggøre brevene.

Litteratur:
Ritzaus Bureau: Fogh beklager svar om Irak-tortur. I: Information, 05/06/2004.

05/05/2004
Lederne af landets rehabiliteringscentre for torturofre og traumatiserede flygtninge er bestyrtede over afsløring af den amerikanske besættelsesmagts anvendelse af tortur over for irakiske krigsfanger
Lederne af landets rehabiliteringscentre for torturofre og traumatiserede flygtninge, forsamlet til møde den 3. maj 2004, giver udtryk for bestyrtelse over de seneste dages afsløring af den amerikanske besættelsesmagts anvendelse af tortur over for irakiske krigsfanger.
Det væsentligste argument for koalitionens tilstedeværelse i Irak har været at beskytte befolkningen mod hidtidige overgreb på menneskerettigheder. Vi må derfor på det kraftigste fordømme, at overgreb, som har været kendt under det tidligere styre, igen tages i anvendelse i Irak.
Gennem arbejdet med behandling af torturofre ved vi, hvor invaliderende det er for krop og sjæl at være udsat for ydmygende overgreb. I tillæg til at de skyldige og ansvarlige bliver straffet, vil vi understrege vigtigheden af, at ofrene får hjælp til at overvinde følgerne og at sikre, at noget lignende ikke kan ske igen.
Da Danmark er en del af koalitionen, vil vi kraftigt opfordre den danske regering til over for den amerikanske og engelske regering at fordømme amerikanske soldaters udøvelse af tortur, således at der ikke kan rejses nogen tvivl om den danske regerings holdning til det, der er foregået.
ARAMUS
ETICA
OASIS
RCT
RCT Fyns Amt
RCT Jylland
RRCF
RFB/BOMI

05/06/2004
Sexual Abuse in Iraq is No Accident
By Tom Cahill
President, Stop Prisoner Rape
http://www.spr.org
Stop Prisoner Rape is an organization I rescued in 1983, directed until 1994, and have been president of since 1998.
Yes, I am a survivor of this barbarism. Memos from my FBI files indicate the Bureau's Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) against the New Left may have set me up to be beaten, gang-raped and otherwise tortured while jailed for civil disobedience in 1968 because of my anti-Vietnam War activities.
I'm not the only peace activist to receive such treatment at the hands of the US criminal justice system. Arrested on the grounds of the White House in Washington, DC, at a "Pray-In" to stop the bombing of Cambodia in 1973, Stephen Donaldson, small and white, was placed in an all-Black cell block where he was beaten and gang-raped for two days. After release from the hospital, he went public at a press conference. Donny and I teamed up in 1984 and worked together on this issue till he died in 1994 of AIDS contracted from rape in prison in the early 80s.
One of the "Watergate plumbers" was confined in the same DC jail as Donny in August 1973. He writes about Donny on pages 318-321 in "Will: The Autobiography of G. Gordon Liddy" (1980).
How many more activists raped in confinement is yet unknown. But because of the extreme humiliation of this barbarism, sexual assault must be an excellent way to silence dissidents. Therefore it's my belief that among other "excesses," sexual torture is being taught at the US Army's infamous "School of the Americas." And may I remind you, Faith Fippinger, a human shield in Bagdad during the invasion last year, is currently in prison for "tresspassing" at a demonstration at the School of the Americas late last year.
Has the United States of America sunk to a new low in depravity, greed, and lust for power? I don't think so. The USA has been "abusing" the whole planet and even many of its own citizens for decades. Pres. George W. Bush is no anomaly as members of the Democratic Party would have us believe. Will politics be different under President John F. Kerry? I don't think so.
The expression on Private Lynndie England's face is haunting. Posed next to a hooded, naked Iraqi prisoner in a film shown on 60 Minutes 2, England is grinning and flashing a jaunty 'thumbs up' as if she'd just hit a home run in a softball game.
But what's really behind England's seemingly casual gesture? In the flurry of reporting and commentary about what took place in the notorious Abu Ghraib prison, the deliberate decision by some American soldiers to use sexual abuse as a tactic to humiliate detainees warrants further examination.
The new reports from Iraq include allegations that coalition soldiers threatened male prisoners with rape, sodomized a detainee with an object, forced a naked, hooded detainee to masturbate, posed groups of naked prisoners in human pyramids, left male prisoners in cells naked or wearing women's underwear, and forced one detainee to simulate oral sex with another detainee.
These are troubling events, but they didn't happen by accident. The choice to use sexually charged forms of abuse was not random or careless. More likely, it was humiliation by design.
Sexual violence is uniquely dehumanizing. Those who perpetrate this kind of abuse, both at home and abroad, are undeniably aware of the shame these acts induce.
And the psychological consequences shouldn't be underestimated. Feelings of self-hate are common, and victims often hesitate to report the abuse in order to avoid the stigma that comes with victimization.
In particular, many male victims of sexual violence report feeling that their masculinity has been compromised. Often, victims blame themselves and even in impossible circumstances believe that they somehow should have prevented it. Long-term psychological consequences may include post-traumatic stress disorder, substance abuse, and suicide.
Some observers have noted that nudity, forced masturbation and humiliating sexual positions are particularly unacceptable in the Islamic world. And it is certainly important to take cultural differences into account. But sexual abuse is universally appalling, and the similarity to what many U.S. prisoners routinely undergo is striking.
Approximately one in five male inmates in the United States has faced forced or pressured sexual contact in custody, according to studies by researchers such as Cindy Struckman-Johnson at the University of South Dakota. One in 10 has been raped. For women, whose abusers are often corrections officers, the rates of sexual assault are as high as one in four in some facilities.
This form of abuse reared its ugly head when police officers sodomized Abner Louima in a New York stationhouse bathroom; when a Wisconsin corrections officer impregnated mentally ill inmate Jackie Noyes; and when corrections staff knowingly taunted Roderick Johnson who was raped and prostituted by Texas prison gangs.
With this pattern of abuse so common at home, it's almost unsurprising that the most senior of the individuals accused of abusing Iraqi detainees, Staff Sergeant Ivan Frederick II, was himself a six-year veteran of the Virginia Department of Corrections.
But, whether it happens in Iraq or in the U.S., sexual abuse is a form of torture employed to uniquely degrade and humiliate prisoners, people who are virtually helpless to prevent it. And unless we stop it, we give our own thumbs up, in a sense, to a well documented and devastating form of brutality.
Lara Stemple
Executive Director
Stop Prisoner Rape
Alex Coolman
Communications Coordinator
Stop Prisoner Rape

05/06/2004
Red Cross Says It Urged U.S. to Act on Iraq Prison Abuse
Staff members of the International Committee of the Red Cross were fully aware of the full spectrum of abuses of Iraqi prisoners by American soldiers at the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad and had repeatedly urged the United States to take corrective action, a spokesman for the humanitarian organization said today, writes the New York Times.

05/06/2004
Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty: the Additional Protocol enters into force in all the Member States
IP/04/602 - Brussels, 6 May 2004
On 30 April, the Vice-President of the European Commission, Loyola. De Palacio officially informed Mohamed El-Baradei, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency of the United Nations (IAEA) based in Vienna, of the readiness of the Member States of the EU to apply the Additional Protocol to the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty. This move will set an example to the international community by guaranteeing a co-ordinated, smooth and uniform implementation of the Additional Protocol in the territory of the EU and by enabling international efforts to combat proliferation to be concentrated in less stable regions of the world. "Through this commitment, the EU has shown itself to be in the vanguard of states seeking universal coverage of these agreements and consequently the strengthening of the international community's efforts to halt the spread of nuclear weapons", said Loyola de Palacio.
The establishment of the Additional Protocol to the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty(1) follows the discovery of clandestine nuclear activities in certain countries, intended to allow the development of weapons of mass destruction. This Protocol was therefore designed to enable the IAEA to improve its ability to detect such activities, by extending the scope of its investigations beyond nuclear fuel cycle installations. It obliges signatory countries to make extensive declarations on all installations holding nuclear materials (even in small quantities) or engaging in nuclear fuel cycle activities, such as universities, research establishments, industrial complexes or hospitals. It is also aimed at installations which do not necessarily hold nuclear materials but which, for example, manufacture the nuclear equipment or have the necessary infrastructure for processing them.
The entry into force of the Additional Protocol will make the European Commission the main interface between the Member States and the IAEA. Most of the Member States' declarations on their installations will originate from or pass through the Commission's services in Luxembourg, before being transmitted to the Vienna Agency. In addition to this, the presence of the Commission's inspectors at site inspections will ensure uniform application of the Additional Protocol provisions across the EU.
The Commission already plays a very important role in the control of nuclear materials within the EU under the Euratom Treaty. It has its own corps of 200 inspectors and also maintains a database containing details of all civilian nuclear materials in the EU. Inspections are already carried out in some locations in co-operation with the IAEA.
(1) World-wide, 189 states are parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Only three major states are not party to this treaty, India, Pakistan and Israel. The NPT aims to eliminate nuclear weapons completely by preventing their spread to other states and progressively reducing existing arsenals. All the countries which are parties to the NPT are required to allow inspectors to verify that their nuclear materials are not diverted to illegal weapons programmes.

05/06/2004

05/07/2004

05/08/2004
USAs forsvarsminister Donald Rumsfeld påtager sig ansvaret for tortursagen, skriver Information.

05/08/2004
Iraqi deserters in Canada
by Kurt Singer
Deserting from the US Armed Forces produce automatically the death sentences through lethal injection. 90.000 deserters found refuge in Canada during the Vietnam war. The new breed of war resisters and deserters are far fewer and no official numbers have been released by the Pentagon. These refugees are hesitating to give their names to protect themselves and their families. However there are two courageous deserters who have opened a website and give information to others.
Jeremy Hinzman had joined the army in the hope to earn money to go to college and enlisted on January 17, 2001 and had married shortly before.Hinzman was interested in Zen and Eastern culture.He and his wife Nga Ngyuen started to visit Quaker meetings and were impressed by their philosphy of non violence . Jeremy felt suddenly uncomfortable in his army unit where he was training to kill an enemy. He decided to apply for a conscentious objector status.Then his unit was shipped to Afghanistan where he worked in the kitchen.In April 2003 his commanding officer pulled him out of the kitchen and informed Jeremy that his hearing was to take place.That happened in Kandahar and Hinzman was not allowed to have a defense attorney or witnesses. The hearing lasted 20 minutes and his conscientious objector application was denied.Hinzman's unit returned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina in April 2003 but in December he received his orders to go to Iraq. It was then in January 2004 that Hinzman and his wife and his 21 month old son Liam went to Toronto. They told the Canadian border control that they wanted to attend an ice hockey game. Canadian Quakers took them in and they live now in an apartment of their own. Jeremy became active in the peace movement.
Brandon Hughey is a teenager from Angelo, Texas. He, too, had joined the armed forces in the hope to obtain a college education. At 17 he had joined the National Guard and entered at 18 his boot camp. Again Quaker meetings convinced Bradon that war was evil and through the Internet he found a peace activist who helped him after a 47 hour drive to cross the border into Canada where he had told the border guards that he wanted to attend a basketball game. Again the Quakers helped to establish Brandon in his new refugee life. One of the Quaker members revealed that there were 317 applications for refugee status pending before the Immigration authorities.
Not all may be anti war refugees but also marijuana smokers and drug dealers.
Another group of deserters from the Iraq war are contractors hired by the US Armed Forces. Several hundreds are employed, some even in the prison areas. According to Bechtel, IRT and Haliburton subsidiaries over one third of their employees quit their jobs and returned to the USA, They felt endangered and insecure in their positions in Iraq. Is this only the tip of the iceberg?

05/09/2004

05/10/2004
Mandela on the war in Iraq
By Kurt Singer
Today, May 10th 2004, ten years after Nelson Mandela, 85, was sworn in as the first black president of the Republic of South Africa, the ailing leader addresses both houses of parliament. He spoke about the American and British war in Iraq to both houses of parliament.He mentioned the international uproar over the horror photographs of tortured Iraqi prisoners.
"We see how powerful countries-all of them socalled democracies manipulate multilateral bodies to the great disadvantage of the suffering and poorer developing nations. in a war that the United Nations did not sanction."Mandela has been an outspoken advesary of President George W. Bush's war politics and called him openly "a president who cannot think properly".
Mandela's speech received wild applause and was hardly mentioned by the US press and television .

05/11/2004
A Double Ordeal for Female Prisoners
By Tracy Wilkinson
L.A. Times Staff Writer
BAGHDAD — One woman told her attorney she was forced to disrobe in front of male prison guards. After much coaxing, another woman described how she was raped by U.S. soldiers. Then she fainted.
A U.S. Army report on abuses at Abu Ghraib prison documented one case of an American guard sexually abusing a female detainee, and a Pentagon spokesman said Monday that 1,200 unreleased images of abuse at Abu Ghraib included "inappropriate behavior of a sexual nature."
Whether it was one or numerous cases of rape, many Iraqis believe that sexual abuse of women in U.S.-run jails was rampant. As a result, female prisoners face grave prospects after they are released: denial, ostracism or even death.
A woman who is raped brings shame on her family in the Islamic world. In many cases, rape victims have been killed by their relatives to salvage family honor, although there is no evidence this has happened to women who have been prisoners in Iraq.
"It is like being sentenced to death," said Sheik Mohammed Bashar Faydhi, a senior cleric based at Baghdad's largest Sunni mosque.

05/12/2004
Detained Children Abuse Allegations Surface
Unicef ‘Profoundly Disturbed’ By Allegations Of Abuse Of Detained Children The United Nations Children’s Fund UNICEF) is profoundly disturbed by news reports alleging that children might have been among those abused in detention centres and prisons in Iraq, a spokesman said today.
“Although the news reports have not been independently substantiated, they are alarming nonetheless,” UNICEF spokesman Damien Personnaz told a news briefing in Geneva, adding that any mistreatment, sexual abuse, exploitation or torture of children in detention is a violation of international law.
Mr. Personnaz’s statement was the latest reaction by a UN body to widely disseminated reports and photographs of abuse of detainees by United States-led coalition personnel in Iraq. Last week Acting UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Bertrand Ramcharan expressed revulsion regarding the reports and photographs.
The detention or imprisonment of a child must be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time, and for their safety and protection children should never be incarcerated with adults, Mr. Personnaz said.
“All persons in detention must be treated with humanity and with respect for their inherent dignity as human beings,” he added. “In particular, States had an obligation to protect children and to ensure that their officials were aware of, trained in, and complied with the relevant international standards.”

05/13/2004
OECD's ministermøde den 13.-14. maj.

05/14/2004
Thule-aftale næsten klar
USA, Grønland og Danmark er meget tæt på en aftale, der gør det muligt for USA at videreudvikle radaranlægget på Thule til brug i et missilforsvar.
Den amerikanske regering er opsat på en snarlig løsning, angiveligt helst inden 28. maj.
Baggrunden er blandt andet, at præsident George W. Bush i sin 2000-valgkamp lovede den amerikanske befolkning et missilskjold i 2004. Thule-radaren er ikke afgørende for dette løfte, men for Bush ville en aftale være et konkret tegn på fremskridt, skriver Jyllands-Posten.

05/14/2004
Torture prison pictures triggered reforms for the CIA
By Kurt Singer
The deputy director for foreign operations James L Pavitt anounced that he would double the CIA's foreign agents. At the moment in 2004 the agency emplyes 1100 secret operatives spread around the world. 41% speak a second language but only 4% each speak Arabic or Chinese. This explains why American intelligence officers cannot even read the street names in Iraq and Afghanistan.Mr. Pavitt also told the press that the CIA no longer calls its agents intelligence officers but case workers.The espionage training school at Camp Peary in Virginia is working 24 hours around the clock. Arabic is taught in Blitz Courses to new recruits at a yearly salary of $50.000 a year. Mr.Pavitt said "WE NEED THOUSAND AND HUNDRED THOUSAND OF PEOPLE TO WIN THIS WAR."Then he admitted " we are running hard to meet the resources we need." Inspite of having been successful in capturing several dozen of militant terrorists and suicide bombers he CIA had many failures as well. They did not prevent the actions of the 19 terrorists on 9/11, or prevent the attack on the Cole or the bombings of the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania nor did they caspture Ben Laden. Their clandestine activities need definite improvements.The last thing they needed were the 1000 plus torture pictures from a Baghdad prison.One of the American reporters said jokingly" the CIA has now more nude pictures than the Clinton administration showed."
The CIA had failed to predict or realize the comingdownfall of the Soviet Union. After the demise of the Soviet empire the agency was reduced by 20 % in panpower and budget.
Cold War espionage veterans are still teachers at Camp Peary and use now Mao Tse Tung's book on Guerilla Warfare.To fight an invisible terrorist enemy Mr. George J.Tenet, Mr. Pavitt's boss as director of the CIA said the organization has to be streamlined and moved from an unbelievable low situation into a high tech scientific clandestine espionage and counter terrorist agency.
The revalry between CIA and FBI had to be ended.
A revamped and modernized CIA is aware that they are threatened daily by Al Qaeda terrorists and suicide bombers who seem almost invisible and replaced by unlimited masses of Muslims who hate the American occupiers and their allies and above all the Western infidels. Some time ago I asked a high ranking CIA officer who he though hat the best acurate, imaginative and long period visionara\y intelligence service. He answered without hesitance: The Vatican.

05/15/2004
International militærnægterdag.
Grundlagt i 1982 af europæiske militærnægtere.

05/16/2004
The Terrible and Strange Death of Nick Berg
by James Conachy
(Courtesy of WSWS.org and Tehran Times)
The terrible death of Nick Berg in Iraq -- beheaded in front of a video camera -- has taken place in such strange and suspicious circumstances that it raises deeply troubling questions. Among them is whether American agencies had a direct or indirect hand in the young man's murder.
Questions immediately arise from the timing and political consequences of his killing. At the height of a massive scandal engulfing the Bush administration, Berg's death has been exploited by the American government and the US media to launch a counter-offensive against the revelations of systematic US torture in Abu Ghraib and other Iraqi prisons. A wholesale attempt is being made to shift American and international public opinion away from the outrage over the criminal character of the US occupation of Iraq, and behind the self-serving argument that American forces are needed in Iraq to prevent the country descending into barbarism and chaos.
Were Berg's murderers being directly paid by the American government, they could not have performed a more timely service for the Bush White House.

05/17/2004

05/18/2004
Folketingsmedlem Søren Søndergaard stillede følgende § 20 spørgsmål S 3926 til forsvarsministeren: "vil ministeren oplyse, hvor mange personer danske tropper i Afghanistan har taget som krigsfanger henholdsvis tilbageholdt, hvem de er overdraget til, samt hvad der siden er sket med dem?"

05/19/2004
URGE CONGRESS TO ELIMINATE FUNDING FOR NEW NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Continuing its drive to develop new, more usable nuclear weapons, the Bush Administration has requested increased funding for the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP) and the Advanced Concepts Initiative for new nuclear weapons. Last year, Congress cut half of the requested funds for the RNEP. This year--with your help--all funds for both the RNEP and the Advanced Concepts Initiative can be eliminated. Congress should not allow the Administration to develop a new generation of nuclear weapons.
ACTION: The House will vote later this evening (Wednesday, May 19) or early tomorrow to cut funds for new nuclear weapons. Contact your representative and ask him/her to vote for the Tauscher-Markey amendment to cut funding for the nuclear "bunker buster" in the defense authorization bill (H.R. 4200).
A similar amendment will be offered by Sens. Kennedy and Feinstein today or tomorrow in the Senate’s version of the defense authorization bill (S. 2400). Contact your members of Congress and tell them to support these amendments.
These votes are likely to be very close. Please forward this action alert to five or more of your friends. Every fax and phone call is important.
FAXING YOUR REPRESENTATIVE IS EASY: Start with the sample letter posted in our Legislative Action Center, personalize the language, then fax your message directly from our site. To view the sample letter, click on the link below, then enter your zip code and click "Go" in the "Take Action Now" box.
Here is the link: http://capwiz.com/fconl/issues/alert/?alertid=5841011&type=CO.
BACKGROUND: Since the end of the Cold War, some civilian military planners and nuclear scientists have promoted the creation of a new class of earth-penetrating nuclear weapons. These weapons are sometimes referred to as "bunker-busters" because they would be designed to burrow into the ground to destroy underground military facilities that are protected by 100 to 300 feet of reinforced concrete or rock. The Energy Department’s budget includes $27.6 million for the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP). The RNEP would use an existing nuclear weapon, redesigned for use against underground bunkers. It would have explosive power up to 70 times that of the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima.
RNEP proponents claim that, because the weapon penetrates the earth before detonating, it would be a "clean" nuclear weapon. In reality, this would be an extremely deadly weapon. If detonated in an urban setting, tens of thousands of people could receive a fatal dose of radiation within the first 24 hours. More would be killed or injured by the extreme pressures of the blast and thermal injuries arising from the heat of the explosion. Still more casualties would result from the resulting fires and the collapse of buildings from the seismic shock that the explosion would produce. According to Sen. Jack Reed (RI), Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrators, "are really city breakers, not bunker busters."
The Bush Administration has repeatedly claimed that the RNEP program is a study and nothing more. However, the Administration’s intentions regarding RNEP go well beyond their initial claims. Energy Department budget documents show funding demands for RNEP increasing dramatically after this year, despite congressional restrictions on further development of this program. The initial three-year study was to cost $45 million, but the Administration’s proposed spending in the next five years would total nearly $500 million and move RNEP into early development and engineering stages.
The Bush Administration is leading the world down the wrong path. Instead of adhering to our obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) by reducing reliance on the most horrific weapons ever created and working for global disarmament, the Administration is seeking new uses for nuclear weapons. Adopting such a nuclear posture is a step backward and a virtual invitation for other nations to opt out of their NPT obligations as well.
David Culp, Legislative Representative
Friends Committee on National Legislation (Quakers)
245 Second Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20002-5795
Tel.: (202) 547-6000, ext. 146
Toll-free: (800) 630-1330, ext. 146
Fax: (202) 547-6019
E-mail: david@fcnl.org

05/19/2004
Udenrigsministeriet refererer Folketingets 2. behandling af forslag om Danmarks ratifikation af Tillægsprotokollen til FN's Torturkonvention.

05/20/2004
Amnesty International støtter Dansk Røde Kors kritik af regering og folketing
Amnesty bakker op om generalsekretær Jørgen Poulsen fra Dansk Røde Kors offentlige kritik af såvel tidligere som nuværende regeringer og folketing for ikke at tage Genévekonventionerne alvorligt og dermed forårsage et skred i holdningerne til tortur og menneskerettigheder.
- Vi er fuldstændig enige med Jørgen Poulsen og det er meget befriende, at Røde Kors sætter ord på det centrale problem, nemlig at respekten for Genèvekonventionerne skrider, siger Amnesty Internationals generalsekretær, Lars Norman Jørgensen.
Læs mere om Amnestys arbejde med Irak og de rapporter, som regeringen overså, på: http://www.amnesty.dk/bibliotek/aktuelt/irak/
Amnesty International calls for a commission of inquiry into 'war on terror' detentions
Amnesty International is calling for an impartial and independent commission of inquiry to be set up by the United States Congress to conduct a thorough investigation into the USA's "war on terror" detentions across the globe. Such a commission, composed of credible experts independent of government, must have broad-ranging powers to examine the administration's detention policies and practices and ensure accountability at the highest level.
The investigation must have the full cooperation of the government. Its purpose must be to ensure that from now on the USA adopts policies that fully meet its international obligations, as well as to identify any officials who may have authorized, condoned or committed war crimes and other human rights abuses in Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantánamo Bay or elsewhere.
The evidence of war crimes committed in Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq has followed persistent claims of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment against detainees during the past two and a half years of the "war on terror". The USA continues daily to violate international law and standards in its detention policy -- by holding detainees outside the protection of the law, including in Guantánamo, Afghanistan and in secret locations. Its alleged transfer of detainees to face torture in third countries has also been a matter of deep concern throughout this period.
Since the outset of the "war on terror", the US administration has fostered a climate conducive to torture and cruelty. A contemptuous approach to international law and standards, the use of incommunicado and secret detention, and the repeated dehumanization and labelling of all detainees as "killers" and "terrorists", have created conditions ripe for torture and other crimes under international law.
Even the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has not had full access to all detainees. The military investigation into Abu Ghraib by Major General Antonio Taguba raised the situation of "ghost detainees", who were moved around within the facility to hide them from the ICRC. The ICRC's own report in February on Coalition detentions in Iraq "establishes that persons deprived of their liberty face the risk of being subjected to a process of physical and psychological coercion, in some cases tantamount to torture". Failure to notify relatives of detainees' whereabouts resulted "in the de facto 'disappearance' of the arrestee for weeks or even months." The ICRC report also said that ill-treatment of detainees deemed to have high intelligence value was systematic, and that the use of solitary confinement in small cells devoid of daylight against such detainees violated the Geneva Conventions.
The commander of the US forces in Iraq has now barred interrogators from using some of the "stress and duress" techniques, reportedly including sleep deprivation, dietary manipulation, stress positions, and the use of dogs, techniques which Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld told a Senate hearing on 12 May had been approved at the Pentagon. Although some such techniques violate the international prohibition on cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, their use has not been precluded in interrogations in Afghanistan, Guantánamo or at secret locations.
In an open letter to President Bush on 7 May 2004, Amnesty International cited the case of a Yemeni national who told the organization in April that he was subjected to sleep deprivation and other cruel or degrading treatment by US agents, including being photographed naked, at a secret detention facility in Kabul. In another recent interview, a former Afghan police officer has said that he was subjected to beating, kicking, sleep deprivation, and sexual abuse during the more than a month he spent in US custody in Afghanistan in 2003. He also said he had been repeatedly photographed, often while naked.
Last week the New York Times published evidence that torture -- including water submersion -- has been used against "high value" detainees at secret locations. The latest edition of the New Yorker magazine reports that the Secretary of Defense approved the expansion of a secret operation -- a "special-access program" (SAP) -- originally for use against such detainees, to prisoners incarcerated in Iraq in the insurgency there. The secret tactics, it is stated, allowed for sexual humiliation and physical coercion. The Department of Defense has issued a general denial of the New Yorker's thorough report, characterizing it as "outlandish, conspiratorial, and filled with error and anonymous conjecture", but has not provided a detailed response to the allegations made.
There is growing evidence that the abuse of prisoners in US custody has been widespread and resulted from US policies as well as a leadership failure. However, the administration continues to claim that only a few soldiers have been responsible. President Bush himself, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, is promoting this message. The most appropriate way to get to the bottom of this and to meet international concern is to establish an expert inquiry independent of government. To ensure its effectiveness and the appearance of impartiality in the eyes of the world, the inquiry would benefit form the advice of international experts such as the United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture.
Prosecuting the "few" alleged perpetrators caught on film in Abu Ghraib prison would clearly not be enough. Full accountability, of persons at all levels of the chain of command, including officers in the armed forces, Central Intelligence Agency personnel and private contractors, with no hint of scapegoating of low-level soldiers and reservist officers, is crucial.
A commission of inquiry must not be a substitute for bringing to justice anyone who has committed human rights violations, including war crimes. As a matter of principle, across all countries, Amnesty International takes the position that justice is best served by prosecuting war crimes and other grave violations of international law, such as torture, in independent and impartial civilian courts. Any trials, however, whether military or civilian, must conform fully to international standards for fair trial.
The problem does not begin or end at Abu Ghraib. The rule of law and promotion of security and human rights demand that daylight be shone onto all US detention policies and practices.

05/20/2004
IOF perpetrate a massacre in Rafah, Shelling a demonstration with missiles and artillery; dozens killed and wounded
In a serious escalation of their war crimes against civilians in Rafah, the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF ) shelled air-to-ground guided missiles and tank shells on a peaceful demonstration in the Gaza southern town of Rafah today Wednesday 19 May 2004. Dozens of casualties were reported; mostly children. Eyewitnesses said that human parts were seen on the ground of the shelling while IOF opened fire at ambulances.
Al Mezan Center for Human Rights emphasizes that this deliberate act constitutes a war crime and a serious escalation of the ongoing crimes and human rights violations perpetrated by the IOF, which have been going unpunished by the International Community. The Center also asserts that the entire world keeps a shameful, questionable state of silence towards Israel’s daily killing of civilians and destruction of civilian property in a systematic, punitive manner.
Al Mezan holds the International Community, and in particular the High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Times of War, of 12 August 1949, responsible for these continued war crimes, which are for a great deal caused by its silence and disregard of reported crimes in the past years, which has encouraged Israel to proceed and enjoy a status of a impunity. The International Community holds a responsibility to pursue and bring to justice the Israeli criminals who perpetrated and ordered the perpetration of such crimes.
Hence, Al Mezan Center for Human Rights calls upon the International Community to relinquish from implicitly encouraging the war crimes perpetrated by IOF in the occupied Palestinian territories and to take immediate steps to ensure the protection of Palestinian civilians by bringing to an immediate halt the latest IOF incursion in Rafah that started early Tuesday 18 May 19, 2004 and during which a civilian demonstration was shelled with heavy ammunition, and to Israel's continued violations of Palestinians' human rights. The Center reminds the International Community of the responsibilities it bears under international law and treaty law and that an urgent intervention is most urgent now.
8 arrested, 3 to hospital after police disperses T-A Rafah protest
We heard what happened in Rafah while preparing in the Gush office for the already announced Friday protest at the Gaza entrance. We couldn''t think of a more fitting reaction than sending out a call to come - once more - to the Defense Ministry for an immediate protest. On the way there, with our banners and shields, we felt rather futile compared with those on whose behalf we were going to protest: the Rafah demonstrators in the middle of whom a helicopter gunship had sent a missile wounding dozens and among the ones killed several kids...
Still, the protest of some 250 - with besides Gush Shalom a very visible (and loud) presence of the dissident reservists (Courage to Refuse) and the Anarchists - had more spirit than the mass rally some days earlier. People easily found each other in furious chanting and the blag flags were there again. Nobody was surprised when some of the young took the initiative of blocking the street. More and more left the sidewalk. Police who started coming, closed off the Kaplan road for traffic, but before they could isolate us we had started marching. Chanting while walking from the Defence ministry gate through the whole Kaplan street into Ibn Gvirol, and from there towards the Rabin Square.
Reactions of passers-by were not unfriendly, and we nearly thought that the police for once decided not to show the usual behavior on this day of shame, but then suddenly they come from nowhere diving into the crowd and singling some out for arrest. Gush Shalom spokesperson Adam Keller was the first - seven polices dragged him, forcing him face-down on the street, and from seeing how they handled his arms and legs it seemed a miracle that he afterwards was not among the three (out of eight arrested) who had to go to hospital. The others were treated no better: Matan Cohen (wounded) , Yonathan Pollack (the "recidivist" anarchist), Elad Orian, refusnik David Zonscheine, Lezer Peled (wounded), Roni Avidov, Gal Chajad (wounded).
Some thirty demonstrators came to the police station, with two of them being able to function as lawyers (adv. Micheal Sfarad, himself a refuser, and activist advocate Yael Varda). After we had seen the wounded three handcuffed but on their feet coming out of the sstation to enter an ambulance, at 11pm the message came that the other arrestees would spend the night at Abu-Kabir (the Arabic name of this prison dating back to the pre-'48 period) after which the judge would decide what to do further.
UNICEF calls for the protection of children in Rafah
JERUSALEM, 19 May 2004 – UNICEF said today it is deeply concerned about the impact on children of the ongoing military operation in the Gaza Strip, particularly a missile strike Wednesday that claimed the lives of at least 10 Palestinians, many of them children.
"Palestinian children have a right to be protected against all acts of violence in the midst of the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict," said David S. Bassiouni, UNICEF Special Representative in Jerusalem. "They have a right to a safe shelter, safe access to their schools and to health services," he said.
With the recent military actions in Rafah – and Wednesday's missile strike – at least 10 children have already lost their lives, including Asma and Ahmed, a 16 and 13-year-old girl and boy, respectively, shot in their home in Rafah on Tuesday morning. Many additional children have been injured and all are facing psychosocial distress.
The ongoing house demolitions in Rafah have left more 1,100 Palestinian people homeless in a 10 day period alone, out of which almost 600 are children. Between September 2000 and May 2004, more than 11,000 Palestinians have lost their homes.
UNICEF, jointly with other UN agencies, is assessing the impact of house demolitions on children and will support efforts to help restore normalcy to children's lives.
Since the start of the conflict, Israeli and Palestinian children have paid a very heavy price, UNICEF said. Over 660 children under age 18 have been killed, of which 560 were Palestinian and 104 were Israeli – including four Israeli sisters killed by militants in an attack in the Gaza Strip on May 2.
"UNICEF calls on the State of Israel to abide by its obligations to the Convention on the Rights of the Child by protecting children from direct exposure to violence, and providing those who have lost their homes with alternative housing," Bassiouni said. "The injudicious use of force where children are present can only bring about the deaths of innocent youngsters. We urge the Israeli authorities to reconsider the impact these incursions are having on Palestinian children."
For further information, please contact:
Michael Bociurkiw
Communications Officer
UNICEF Jerusalem
Tel: +972-2-583-0013/4 (ext 242)
Fax: +1-416-352-5068
Mobile: +972-577-293214 / +972-59674385
Email: mbociurkiw@unicef.org

05/20/2004
Livermore Lab's draft operating document
May 20, 2004
Mr. Thomas Grim, L-293
U.S. Department of Energy,
National Nuclear Security Administration
Livermore Site Office, SWEIS Document Manager
7000 East Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550-9234
Fax: (925) 422-1776
Email: tom.grim@oak.doe.gov
RE: Comments on the Department of Energy's Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS) for Continued Operations at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL).
Dear Mr. Grim:
Through this letter we are expressing our deep concern with the health and environmental risks posed by the expanded nuclear weapons mission for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) into the indefinite future. We appreciate your focused attention to this matter. Below, we have outlined a number of specific concerns that, taken cumulatively, lead us to the conclusion that the Site Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS) for the continuing operation of LLNL is so deficient in information and analysis that it must be fixed and re-circulated in draft form. This would allow the community, the regulators, and the legislators to have the opportunity to evaluate the new information that is requested in these comments. Our specific concerns are:
1. The same day of the public hearings for the SWEIS, April 27, 2004, the Congressional Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations for the Committee on Government Reform held a hearing on the security of nuclear materials. The hearing highlighted potentially insurmountable problems with plutonium and highly enriched uranium at certain Department of Energy (DOE) sites, with a focus on the vulnerability of nuclear materials storage at LLNL. On May 7, 2004, Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham delivered a speech on the deficiencies in the security of nuclear materials at LLNL and other DOE sites. The Energy Secretary made a commitment to consider removing the special nuclear materials at LLNL by 2005. This recent acknowledgement by the DOE that security at LLNL is questionable makes it imperative that the SWEIS evaluate an alternative that would remove all special nuclear materials from LLNL. These acknowledgements make this not only a reasonable option, but one that should be evaluated because it is a foreseeable outcome within the next decade at LLNL.
2. Instead of reducing the amount of special nuclear materials on-site at LLNL, this plan proposes to more than double the limit for plutonium at Livermore Lab from 1,540 pounds to 3,300 pounds. Additionally, under the Proposed Action, the administrative limit for highly enriched uranium in Building 239 would increase from 55 pounds to 110 pounds. Seven million people live in surrounding areas, and residences are built right up to the fence. Plutonium is difficult to store safely because, in certain forms, it can spontaneously ignite and burn. Moreover, it poses a criticality risk when significant quantities are stored in close proximity. The amount of plutonium proposed for LLNL is sufficient to make more than 300 nuclear bombs. Because of the health risks, the proliferation dangers, storage hazards, and very serious security concerns, we believe it is irresponsible to store plutonium, highly enriched uranium and tritium at LLNL. We are calling upon the DOE to de-inventory the plutonium, highly enriched uranium and tritium stocks at LLNL rather than to increase them.
3. The SWEIS proposes to increase the at-risk limits for tritium ten fold, from just over 3 grams to 30 grams. The SWEIS proposes to increase the at-risk limit for plutonium from 44 pounds to 132 pounds. We believe it is unsafe to increase the amount of tritium and plutonium that can be "in process" in one room at one time. LLNL has a history of criticality violations with plutonium and releases of both tritium and plutonium, making it evident that these amounts should be decreased, rather than increased.
4. This plan will revive a project that was canceled more than 10 years ago because it was dangerous and unnecessary. The project was called Plutonium - Atomic Vapor Laser Isotope Separation (AVLIS). Now it is called the "Integrated Technology Project"(ITP) and the "Advanced Materials Program"(AMP). This is a scheme to heat and vaporize plutonium and then shoot multiple laser beams through the vapor to separate out plutonium isotopes. The ITP / AMP is a health risk and a nuclear proliferation nightmare. We believe the ITP and AMP work should be cancelled as the Plutonium AVLIS was cancelled in 1990 - this time permanently.
5. This plan makes Livermore Lab the place to test new manufacturing technologies for producing plutonium pits for nuclear weapons. A pit is the softball-sized piece of plutonium that sits inside a modern nuclear weapon and triggers its thermonuclear explosion. DOE says these new technologies will then be used in a new bomb factory, called the Modern Pit Facility (MPF). Public and Congressional opposition to the MPF has caused its delay this year. The Livermore Lab plutonium pit program goes full-speed ahead in the wrong direction. It will enable the MPF and production of 150 - 450 plutonium bomb cores annually, with the ability to run double shifts and produce 900 cores per year. This production capability would approximate the combined nuclear arsenals of France and China - each year. We call upon the DOE to halt all work on plutonium pit production technologies at Livermore Lab. We believe it is premature for the DOE to spend taxpayer dollars on this technology and the prudent and reasonable outcome is to delay or cancel this project.
6. This plan will add plutonium, highly-enriched uranium and large quantities of lithium hydride to experiments in the National Ignition Facility mega-laser when it is completed at Livermore Lab. Using these materials in the NIF will increase its usefulness for nuclear weapons development, including for the design of new types of nuclear weapons. It will also make the NIF more hazardous to workers and the environment. This is not only dangerous to people's health and safety, and a proliferation risk, but it is sure to result in an inordinate cost to the taxpayer. No cost estimate associated with this proposal has been released to date. We ask the DOE to cancel these dangerous, polluting, proliferation-provocative and unnecessary new experiments proposed for the NIF.
7. The SWEIS reveals plans to manufacture tritium targets at LLNL. The tritium-filled targets are the radioactive fuel pellets that the NIF's 192 laser beams will "shoot" in an attempt to create a thermonuclear explosion. Producing the targets will increase the amount of tritium that is used in any one room at Livermore Lab from the current limit of just over 3 grams to 30 grams - nearly 10-fold more. In the mid-1990's, LLNL stated that target fabrication was to occur off-site because of LLNL's proximity to large populations. Livermore Lab has a history of tritium accidents, spills and releases. The NIF will increase the amount of airborne radioactivity emanating from LLNL. We call on DOE to cancel plans to manufacture tritium targets for NIF at Livermore Lab. Further, we urge cancellation of the NIF megalaser. Cancellation of NIF is a reasonable alternative that should be fully analyzed in the SWEIS.
8. This plan also calls for Livermore Lab to develop diagnostics to "enhance" the nation's readiness to conduct full-scale underground nuclear tests. This is a dangerous step back to the days of unrestrained nuclear testing. All work at LLNL to reduce the time it takes to conduct a full-scale underground nuclear test should be terminated immediately.
9. This plan mixes bugs and bombs at Livermore. It calls for collocating an advanced bio-warfare agent facility (BSL-3) with nuclear weapons activities in a classified area at Livermore Lab. The plan proposes genetic modification and aerosolization (spraying) with live anthrax, plague and other deadly pathogens. This could weaken the international biological weapons treaty -- and it poses a risk to workers, the public and the environment here in the Bay Area. The draft SWEIS does not adequately describe these programs, or the unique security, health and environmental hazards they present. Construction should be halted on the portable BSL-3 facility. All plans to conduct advanced bio-warfare agent (BSL-3) research on site at LLNL should be terminated.
10. There are 108 buildings identified at LLNL as having potential seismic deficiencies relative to current codes. The SWEIS should include a complete list of these buildings and an accounting of the ones that house or may house hazardous, radiological and biological research materials. LLNL is located within 1 kilometer of two significant earthquake faults, including the Las Positas Fault Zone less than 200 feet from the LLNL boundary. How can we mitigate harm done from an earthquake that damages these buildings before they are brought up to code? We urge the Livermore Lab to stop any work with hazardous, radioactive or biological substances that may be occurring in any building that does not comply with federal standards.
11. A contractor will be paid to package and ship more than 1,000 drums of transuranic and mixed transuranic waste to the WIPP dump in New Mexico, yet the SWEIS says this is exempt from environmental review. This work in its entirety must be included in the review.
12. The DOE does not acknowledge in the SWEIS that the double-walled shipping containers described in the document may be replaced by less health - protective single-lined containers. We believe that no waste should be shipped in single-walled containers and the SWEIS should provide a guarantee to that effect.
13. The Purpose and Need statement in the SWEIS relies heavily upon the US Nuclear Posture Review, which calls for an aggressive modernization and manufacturing base within the US nuclear weapons complex. This stands in stark contrast to the binding legal mandate to shift "from developing and producing new weapons designs to dismantling obsolete weapons and maintaining a smaller weapons arsenal". We believe a revised Purpose and Need statement should accurately reflect the Livermore Lab's legal responsibility with regard to US law, including US obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
Further, the Purpose and Need statement in the SWEIS almost completely omits LLNL's important role in civilian science research. This omission fatally flaws the alternatives analysis in the SWEIS by neglecting to consider the expanded role that civilian science programs at the LLNL could play in the next decade.
The alternatives analysis should be revised to consider LLNL's role in light of the commitments in the NPT and the Livermore Lab's civilian science mission as well as the compelling case for removing special nuclear materials (i.e., plutonium and highly enriched uranium) from the LLNL site.
Sincerely,

05/21/2004
Spanien trækker sine sidste tropper hjem fra Irak.

05/21/2004
The Other Prisoners
By Luke Harding
© 2004 Guardian Newspapers Limited
Thursday, May 20, 2004 -- The scandal at Abu Ghraib prison was first exposed not by a digital photograph but by a letter. In December 2003, a woman prisoner inside the jail west of Baghdad managed to smuggle out a note. Its contents were so shocking that, at first, Amal Kadham Swadi and the other Iraqi women lawyers who had been trying to gain access to the US jail found them hard to believe.
The note claimed that US guards had been raping women detainees, who were, and are, in a small minority at Abu Ghraib. Several of the women were now pregnant, it added. The women had been forced to strip naked in front of men, it said. The note urged the Iraqi resistance to bomb the jail to spare the women further shame.

05/21/2004
Bush vs. Greenpeace - NOT GUILTY!
Thursday, May 20, 2004 -- It's over! I've been in court in Miami all this week defending our ability to stand up for what's right for the planet and our right to speak out against environmental abuses.
And at 3:30 this afternoon the judge acquitted Greenpeace on all charges. The prosecution's case was unproven before we even presented our defense. I wanted you to be among the first to know. Thanks so much for your support.
It's incredible -- in the last couple of weeks 81,311 people like you, all around the world, have e-mailed President Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft to condemn this prosecution. The US Government has never heard from Greenpeace in such strong numbers. It's a great show of what we can all do together, and I congratulate you.
Together we have won. Bush and Ashcroft have been shown to have been vindictive, using an 1872 law, and shown to be trying to stifle civil disobedience by shutting Greenpeace down.
But Greenpeace is still in business, and we come out of court more determined than ever to stand up for the planet.
Our campaign to defend ancient forests, in the Amazon -- where this Miami case started -- and the last remaining ancient forests in the United States, continues. Watch us.
However, the threat to Greenpeace is not yet over. Hard on the heels of the US Government's case, we may end up in court against Exxon Mobil, the world's largest corporate producer of global warming gases. Last year Greenpeace volunteers protested at their headquarters dressed in tiger suits to highlight Exxon's role in global warming. They didn't like it, and our volunteers face felony charges. Like Bush, they are trying to shut us up for good.
So please, keep Greenpeace in action, be part of the action.
We couldn't have done it without you.
Rave on,
John Passacantando
Executive Director
Greenpeace

05/22/2004
An Oildriven Immoral War
by Kurt Singer
These were the words of the 26 year old Florida National Guard soldier who had served over 8 years in the armed forces. 6 month in Iraq. Staff Sgt.Camilio Mejia went home to Miami on a furlough, bitter and disappointed about this abominable war. He had led an infantry squad and experienced plenty of actions. In an interview with the New York Times he told the columnist Bob Herbert that he had seen "the slaughter of Iraqi civilians."
Mejia had personally seen the mistreatments of prisoners, the killing of children, the cruel deaths of American soldiers. He accused glory hunting officers putting American units in needlessly dangerous positions.
"Imagine being in the infantry in Ramadi like we were and you get shot at it every day and you get mortared where you lived with rocket propelled grenades and people were dying and getting wounded and maimed every day. A lot of horrible things became acceptable.'"Sgt. Mejia told more and more of the war horrors were childre childer and women were killed as if Iraqis were not human beings. The staff sergeant deserted. But when his unite returned home he returned and asked to be treated as a conscientious objector and be discharged. This request was denied and he faced a military court. The jury of seven men and one woman. Most of them had served in Iraq. They sentenced Staff Sergeant Mejia to one year of hard labor, losing his rank and he received a dishonorable discharge. Mejia was not allowed to present witnesses or references to the legality of this war. All wars create atrocities, conscientous objectors and soldiers whose conscience turns them against the wars. Mejia was not an American citizen. He held dual ctzenship of Costa Rica and Nicaragua.

05/23/2004
Amerikaneren Michael Moore vinder med filmen Farnheit 911, de gyldne palmer ved filmfestivallen i Cannes.
Litteratur: Monggård, Christian: Hvorfor lige ham? I: Information, 05/28/2004.

05/24/2004
Kvindernes internationale nedrustningsdag.
Grundlagt i 1981 af 40 kvinder fra 11 europæiske lande.

05/25/2004

05/26/2004
Forespørgselsdebat (F 60) i folketinget den 26. maj 2004 om opgradering af Thule-radaren
Folketinget noterer med tilfredshed, at Danmark og Grønland i fællesskab er nået til enighed med USA om et aftalekompleks i tilknytning til den amerikanske anmodning om tilladelse til en opgradering af Thule-radaren. Idet Landsstyrets tilslutning noteres, opfordrer Folketinget regeringen til at imødekomme den amerikanske anmodning om opgradering af Thule-radaren, under forudsætning af endelig indgåelse af det foreliggende samlede aftalekompleks, som skitseret af regeringen.
Forslaget vedtages med støtte fra størstedelen af partierne - herunder de to grønlandske medlemmer af Folketinget (101 stemmer). SF og Enhedslisten undlod at stemme (10 stemmer). Ingen stemmer imod forslaget.

05/27/2004
Africa Launches Peace and Security Council : Leaders are Increasingly In Favor of Intervention
by Mohammed Adow
BBC, Addis Ababa
African leaders have launched the Peace and Security Council of the African Union, in Ethiopia. Its mission is to deal with the main problem facing African nations since they achieved independence -- war between nations and within nations.
The council's objective will be to work towards a common defense policy and develop a united defense force.
But experts point to the new challenges facing the council, such as the large number of conflicts -- and their scale.
And it is difficult to find funds to run the peacekeeping missions and to pay for the conflict resolution responsibilities that the council has undertaken.

05/27/2004
Forsvarsministeren besvarede § 20 spørgsmål S 3926: "Forsvarskommandoen har oplyst, at de danske styrker ikke har taget krigsfanger i Afghanistan. Danske styrker i Afghanistan har i samarbejde med de amerikanske styrker været med til at tilbageholde 34 personer. Alle disse 34 personer er efterfølgende blevet frigivet i Afghanistan."

05/27/2004

05/28/2004

05/29/2004
Norwegian city of Kragerø honours Bodil Biørn, unsung hero and relief worker during Armenian genocide
Brussels, Belgium - On the initiative of the Armenian community of Aleppo, Syria, the Norwegian city of Kragerø (11000 inhabitants) has erected a statue honoring Bodil Catharina Biørn, who spent 30 years of her life providing relief to the Armenians of Turkey before, during and after the Armenian Genocide. The statue will be unveiled on Saturday, May 29.
After studying nursing in Germany, Bodil Biørn, the daughter of a wealthy ship owner, left her native Kragerø in 1905 to go to Turkey. There, as part of benevolent evangelical missions, she provided aid to the Christian populations, and especially to the Armenians, who endured oppression under the Ottomans and who were regularly victims of extortion.
Stationed in various regions of the Ottoman Empire (e.g., Van, Cilicia), Bodil Biørn was in Mush in 1915 when the Genocide began. She poured her energy into providing assistance to survivors there and later in Armenia, during the First Republic (1918-1920).
After the Sovietization of Armenia, she continued her philathropical work in the Armenian orphanages of Syria and Lebanon, where she adopted an orphan she named Fridjof. She finally left the region to return to her country in 1936.
"It is a moral duty for Armenians to pay homage to the many honorable, just people, often women, often Scandinavians, who provided relief to the victims of the barbarity committed by the Young Turks. With this commemoration, Bodil Biørn finally emerges from anonymity and takes her place beside Maria Jacobsen, Karen Jeppe, Alma Johansson or Amalia Lange, her sisters in compassion," declared Laurent Leylekian, executive director of the European Armenian Federation.

05/29/2004
USA anvender klyngebomber i Falluja i Irak, skriver Arbejderen.

05/30/2004
Operation Danish Bacon
Danske militærlæger skyder grise, som holdes kunstigt i live, mens de er øvelsesmål for krigskirugi, skriver Berlingske Tidende.

05/31/2004

Top


Gå til Fredsakademiets forside
Tilbage til indholdsfortegnelsen

Send kommentar, email eller søg i Fredsakademiet.dk
Locations of visitors to this page