Det danske Fredsakademi

Kronologi over fredssagen og international politik 24. februar 2005 / Time Line February 24, 2005

Version 3.5

23. Februar 2005, 25. Februar 2005

Canada refuses further role in missile defence
Globe and Mail Update
Days after informing the Washington, the federal government formally announced Thursday that Canada will refuse any further participation in the controversial missile defence shield that the United States is building.
Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre Pettigrew made the decision public after months of equivocating by the Liberal government and days of denials that a decision had been made.
"After careful consideration of the issue, we have decided that Canada will not participate in the U.S. ballistic missile defence system," Mr. Pettigrew said in the chamber of the House of Commons.
The announcement came only days after Frank McKenna, the next ambassador to the United States, set off a political storm by saying that Canada is already participating in the missile shield. He said that an amendment to NORAD, the continental joint air -defence pact, meant that Canada's de facto participation had begun.
Mr. McKenna made his comments on Tuesday, about the time, Prime Minister Paul Martin has now acknowledged, that the United States received the formal refusal from Canada.
"The official Canadian position was conveyed by Foreign Minister Pettigrew to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at our meetings in Brussels," he told reporters.
Mr. Martin's timeline contradicts comments from government MPs this week in the House of Commons, where opposition politicians were told that they would be informed "when a decision is made."
On both Tuesday and Wednesday, Defence Minister Bill Graham insisted that nothing had changed on the missile-defence file and that a decision was forthcoming.
The minority Liberals could have lost if missile defence had come to a vote in the House of Commons. A number of senior government sources have recently told reporters in The Globe and Mail's Ottawa bureau that the federal government felt that the deep unpopularity of missile defence among Canadians made further participation a non-starter.
Mr. Martin said in his comments, made moments later after a cabinet meeting, that the Liberal's military priorities are "the ones that we set out yesterday" in the budget, primarily borders, Arctic sovereignty, coastal defence, intelligence-gathering and increasing the size of the army...
Litteratur: Canadisk nej til USAs missilskjold. I: Arbejderen, 02/25/2005.
Leder: Var Bush ikke lidt bleg ... I: Arbejderen, 02/25/2005.
Terp, Holger: Grønland oprustes uden om grønlænderne. I: Arbejderen, 02/25/2005.



Gå til Fredsakademiets forside
Tilbage til indholdsfortegnelsen for februar 2005

Send kommentar, email eller søg i
Locations of visitors to this page